Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers

IELTS Academic Reading Passage
20:00
The controversy surrounding genetically engineered food can teach people involved in nanotechnology several important lessons.

  1. “The time has passed for discussing the benefits and drawbacks of GM crops. The commercialization of GM crops will become an undesirable alternative due to severe and persistent economic intimidation.”

  2. These are the kind of statements made in an article in the most recent issue of Earth First!, a radical environmental publication, that give people working to commercialise biotechnology the sweats. For the most part, those concerned, the level of public opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) came as a shock and surprise. Some are now speculating as to whether nanotechnology, which refers to the manipulation of matter at sizes of a millionth of a millimetre, would experience a similar reaction and, if so, whether its proponents might draw any lessons from the public’s opposition to biotechnology.Gain of Doom

  3. Jeffrey Matsuura, a law professor at the University of Dayton in Ohio, was present at a Nanotech conference held in Boston last week, but he was hidden away in a forgotten corner with his unassuming poster of his work. But everyone in attendance needed to consider his warning, especially the investors who were searching the conference for investment opportunities. And the reason for this is that nanotechnology is already influenced by a number of the reasons that led to a popular backlash against biotechnology. According to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists believed that the general population would recognise and value biotechnology’s promise to enhance quality of life right away. Instead, the risks caught the media’s and a large portion of the public’s attention. Well-fed The idea of cheaper food, in particular, was regarded with skepticism by European customers. Many believed that the hazards associated with cultivating and ingesting the crops would be borne by the general public, while the benefits would go to the businesses that had produced GMOs.

  4. According to Dr. Matsuura, the public’s opinion of nanotechnology is evolving in a similar manner. The initial uses of nanotechnology, like those of biotechnology, won’t have many overt advantages for consumers. Reduced applications of agricultural chemicals, which assist to keep the cost down while improving yields, are reminiscent of the “advantages” of biotech, as are better, cheaper materials and hidden production efficiencies that benefit producers initially. Consumer gains that are immediately apparent, like advancements in medicine, are further off.

  5. This is unnecessary because consumers ultimately gain from cost savings as well. However, in combination with the perception that there are risks, a lack of instant advantages could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech. And there are possible risks. It is absurd to worry about uncontrollable, self-replicating “nanobots” that would ultimately consume and turn the entire planet into “grey goo.” It is still possible for new “nanoparticles” to pose serious toxicological risks.

  6. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they might stick to the lungs if ingested. They are theoretically tiny enough to get inside living cells and build up there. In addition, at a Royal Institution presentation in London in January, Ken Donaldson, a professor of respiratory toxicology at the University of Edinburgh, demonstrated that ultrafine carbon particles can enter the bloodstream and travel to the brain after inhalation.

  7. Nanoparticle-based goods, including sunscreen and auto components, are already widely available. Despite the fact that all of this might sound concerning, people have always been subjected to various types of nanoparticles throughout history. For instance, carbon particulates comprise soot. Yet, nanoparticles from sources including diesel soot, photocopier toner, and welding gases are already connected to ill-health. Many people are probably concerned about the possibility of more such particles. It makes sense that several speakers at the Boston conference referred to the need to “aggressively” handle public concerns about nanotechnology.

  8. One of them was Clayton Teague, the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office’s director in America. He claims that just like any other member of the public, the American government is sensitive to any indication of a real health danger. The risks of nanotechnology to the ecosystem and to human health are currently the subject of numerous sizable and well-funded studies.

  9. Dr. Teague adds that any choices made regarding nanotechnology will be carefully considered and supported by reliable scientific evidence. But even if science approves, one of Dr. Matsuura’s lesson is that this might not always prevail and that concern over possible abuses and accidents may end up dictating the conversation.

  10. Dr. Matsuura suggests, among other things, that everyone participating should convey the same message. A person who is worried about the hazards cannot be informed that a technology is unimportant after being told that it would transform the world by investors. Saying that anything may be both innovative and unimportant strikes the wrong tone, in his opinion. Such contradictions will increase public worry and suspicion.


  11. Product Placement

  12. Donald Reed is a senior consultant with Ecos in Sydney, Australia-based company that serves as a middleman between businesses and activists. Mr. Reed even advises businesses to consider the early commodities they decide to develop, namely whether they can show the “societal value” of these products. One early application of nanotechnology, for instance, might be the development of inexpensive, effective photovoltaic materials, which are used to produce power from sunlight.

Questions 1-4

Take a look at the following people with the list of statements below. Choose the appropriate statement for each individual.

  1. Clayton Teague
  2. Ken Donaldson
  3. Donald Reed
  4. Jeffrey Matsuura

List of statements:

A. Factors that led to resistance to biotechnology are having an impact on nanotechnology.

B. The majority of the benefits of nanotechnology growth will go to Europeans.

C. Any decisions regarding nanotechnology will be made on the basis of reliable scientific evidence.

D. Governments are powerless to influence the advancement of nanotechnology.

E. There’s no need to be alarmed about nanotechnology.

F. When inhaled, carbon nanoparticles can travel to the blood flow and brain.

G. Companies should demonstrate the social benefits of their early nanotechnology items.

 

Questions 5-8

Complete the sentences given below.
For each answer, choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the paragraph.
Fill in boxes 5 – 8 on your answer sheet with your responses.

5. Those who were employed there were shocked to learn that the general public strongly disapproved of __________.

6. Europeans responded to the suggestion of cheaper food with __________.

7. Nanobots, which could one day alter the Earth is _____________, are causing people anxiety.

8. Photocopier toner nanoparticles have already been tied to _________.

 

Questions 9-13

Using the letters from A-L listed below, complete the summary.

Some individuals think that nanotechnology might have the same 9. ____________fate as biotechnology. Rather than celebrating the 10. _____________, the media and a lot of the general public concentrate on the 11. _______________of biotechnology. Therefore, it is crucial to underline the immediate 12. __________ of nanotechnology; otherwise, the public may develop a 13. _______________ towards nanotech. Hence, it’s critical that everyone involved maintain consistency.

A. Worse

B. Greater

C. Devices

D. Particles

E. Costs

F. Latter

G. Dangers

H. Thoughts

I. Advantage

J. Former

K. Attitude

L. Comparable

 

IELTSVisa Logo

Solution For: Much Ado About Nothing

Reading Answers

1 C 2 F
3 G 4 A
5 GMOs 6 Skepticism
7 Absurd 8 Ill-health
9 L 10 F
11 G 12 I
13 K
R

Review and Practice

  • Regularly practice with IELTS reading samples and time yourself to get used to the pressure of the exam.
  • Review your mistakes to understand where you went wrong and how to avoid similar errors in the future.

Our Books

Master IELTS Speaking Part 1

IELTS Writing Task 1 Book

IELTS Writing Task 2 Book

Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers Explanation

Comin Soon

Practice IELTS Other Modules

IELTS Listening

The IELTS Listening test assesses how well you can understand spoken English in various contexts. It lasts about 30 minutes and is divided into four sections with a total of 40 questions. The listening tasks become increasingly difficult as the test progresses.

IELTS Academic Reading

The IELTS Academic Reading section assesses your ability to understand and interpret a variety of texts in academic settings. It is designed to evaluate a range of reading skills, including skimming for gist, reading for main ideas, reading for detail, understanding inferences, and recognizing a writer's opinions and arguments.

IELTS Speaking

The IELTS Speaking test assesses your ability to communicate in English on everyday topics. It lasts 11-14 minutes and consists of three parts: introduction, cue card, and a discussion based on the cue card topic.

IELTS General Reading

IELTS General Reading tests your ability to understand and interpret various types of texts. Here are some key areas and types of content you can expect to encounter in the reading section, along with tips for effective preparation.

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1

In IELTS Academic Writing Task 1, you are presented with a visual representation of information, such as graphs, charts, tables, or diagrams, and you are required to summarize, compare, or explain the data in your own words.

IELTS General Writing Task 1

In IELTS General Writing Task 1, you are required to write a letter based on a given situation. The letter can be formal, semi-formal, or informal, depending on the prompt. Here’s a breakdown of the key components to include in your letter

IELTS Academic Writing Task 2

In IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, you are required to write an essay in response to a question or topic. Here’s a guide to help you understand the essential elements of this task

IELTS Exam Tips

To succeed in the IELTS exam, practice regularly, familiarize yourself with the test format, improve your vocabulary, develop time management skills, and take mock tests to build confidence.

Grammer for IELTS

Grammar is the foundation of effective communication in English. Understanding tense usage, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure enhances clarity and coherence in writing and speaking.

Vocabulary for IELTS

Vocabulary plays a crucial role in the IELTS (International English Language Testing System) exam, especially in the Speaking and Writing sections. Here’s an overview of why vocabulary is important and how it impacts your performance

RECENT IELTS SAMPLES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Walking with dinosaurs 

Walking with dinosaurs 

Peter L. Falkingham and his colleagues at Manchester University are developing techniques that...

WEATHERING IN THE DESERT

WEATHERING IN THE DESERT

In the deserts, as elsewhere, rocks at the earth's surface are changed by weathering, which...

Our IT Company Services

error: Content is protected !!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This